The
at risk of extinction within six months!
Dr Lindy Lumsden.
Arthur Rylah
Institute, Department of Sustainability and Environment,
E-mail: Lindy.lumsden@dse.vic.gov.au
The Christmas
Island Pipistrelle Pipistrellus murrayi, at
just 3 g is one of

A reassessment of the number of individuals remaining in
January 2009 suggests there could be as few as 20 individuals left. The only known communal roost contains only
four individuals. Three years ago there
were 54 individuals in this colony and there were several other known, similar-sized
colonies. The long-term monitoring data
and the recent reassessment suggest that,
if the current rate of decline continues, this species is likely to be extinct within
the next 6 months!
The cause of this rapid decline remains unknown, despite the
identification of a range of potential threatening processes (Schulz and
Lumsden 2004, James 2005, James and Retallick 2007, Lumsden et al. 2007). Extensive areas of habitat are available,
with 75% of the island covered by primary or secondary rainforest. The pipistrelle is a generalist aerial
insectivore and as there appears to be an abundance of nocturnal flying insects,
lack of food is unlikely to be the cause.
Predation or disturbance at roost sites is considered one of the most
likely threats to the survival of the species (Schulz and Lumsden 2004, Lumsden
et al. 2007). Individuals roost in colonies under
exfoliating bark on dead trees, many of which are heavily decayed and
collapsing (James and Retallick 2007, Lumsden et al. 2007). A number of
introduced species may be preying on, or disturbing bats from within their
roosts, including Common Wolf Snake Lycodon
aulicus capucinus, Black Rat Rattus
rattus, Feral Cat Felis catus and
Giant Centipede Scolapendra morsitans. Although not considered the primary cause of
decline, the recent explosion of Yellow Crazy Ants Anoplolepis gracilipes is likely to have exacerbated the
situation. It is also possible that some
form of disease may be contributing to the decline, however, with the exception
of individuals having low white blood cell counts, there is little evidence for
this (Lumsden et al. 2007).
A range of management actions are currently being undertaken
to monitor the population and control some threatening processes, including
installing protective barriers around the base of known roost trees, extensive
detector surveys to locate foraging areas and searches for potential roost
sites. However, despite these efforts
the population continues to plummet to a critically low level.

Figure
1:
It is critical
therefore that a captive breeding program is established immediately as
insurance against further decline in numbers and as a source of individuals to
re-establish wild populations once the cause of decline has been identified and
controlled (James
and Retallick 2007, Lumsden et al.
2007). An emergency rescue program has
been proposed that will attempt to catch the remaining individuals to form the
basis of a captive colony. It is essential
this is undertaken within the next 3 months (i.e. by March 2009) – leaving it
any longer than this there is a risk there will be so few animals left that it
will not be possible to catch them. If sufficient
animals can be caught and they acclimatise to captivity, a commitment will then
need to be made to a long-term (10 year) breeding program to enable sufficient
animals to be bred for a release program.
Immediate action and a significant commitment from the
Australian government is required if the extinction of this species is to be
prevented. We urgently need to bring the
plight of this species to government’s attention with as many letters as
possible.
Please write to Peter Garrett as Minister for the
Environment and Bob Debus the Minister responsible for Territories, outlining
the urgency of the situation and requesting their immediate action to:
a) fund an
emergency rescue program aimed at catching the remaining few animals and
establishing a captive colony;
b) if
sufficient individuals are caught, fund a long-term captive breeding program by
establishing a purpose-built facility on Christmas Island and employing
experienced staff to run it; and
c) fund
targeted research to determine the cause of the decline so that mitigation
actions can be undertaken.
Without this urgent action it is inevitable that this
species will go extinct in the very near future.
Contact details
The
Honourable Peter Garrett
Minister
for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts
Parliament
House
http://www.aph.gov.au/house/members/member.asp?id=HV4
The
Honourable Bob Debus
Minister
for Home Affairs
Parliament
House
http://www.aph.gov.au/house/members/member.asp?id=8IS
References
James, D.J. (2005). Christmas
Island Pipistrelle Pipistrellus murrayi:
An interim assessment of conservation status and threats. A report to Parks
Australia North,
James, D.J. and
Retallick, K. (2007). Research into the conservation status and threats
of the Christmas Island Pipistrelle Pipistrellus murrayi, 2004-2006.
Parks
Lumsden, L. and Cherry, K. (1997). Report on a
preliminary investigation of the Christmas Island Pipistrelle Pipistrellus murrayi, in June – July
1994. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research,
Lumsden, L., Silins, J. and Schulz, M. (1999).
Population dynamics and ecology of the Christmas Island Pipistrelle Pipistrellus murrayi on
Lumsden, L., Schulz,
M., Ashton, R. and Middleton, D. (2007). Investigation of threats to the
Christmas Island Pipistrelle. A report to the Department of the Environment and
Water Resources. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department
of Sustainability and Environment,
Schulz, M. and Lumsden, L.F. (2004). National
Recovery Plan for the Christmas Island Pipistrelle Pipistrellus murrayi.
Commonwealth of
Tidemann, C. (1985). A study of the status, habitat requirements and management of the two
species of bats on Christmas Island (